Archive for the 'sti' Category

Unhappy Vag

This week I have an unhappy vagina. There will be no wild escapades on Friday night because I’m being treated for bacterial vaginosis. Before you go, “Ouch!” I should mention that it doesn’t hurt at all, in fact if I didn’t have a doctor for a Dom I might have not noticed it at all. A couple of times MasterDoc has told me, “I think you have bacterial vaginosis,” and I’ve just whined that it’s a pain to get a gynecologist appointment and I didn’t notice anything’s wrong so I just let it run its course and ignored it. This time, I knew that he would be most unhappy with me if I did not get it treated so I went to the gyn. The only symptoms I had were a slightly off odor coming from down there (and I do mean slightly) and some dryness during intecourse last time I had it. But I knew from the off odor that I had an infection again and this time I should take care of myself properly.

BV is apparently the most common vaginal infection in women of childbearing age. It can be spread through sexual intercourse, but even women who don’t have sex can get it too. So I thought I’d share a link (or two) to info for you all (especially for those of you who have vaginas out there). It’s easily treatable - I was given a one-time use antibiotic cream to put in. I can’t have sex for 5 days, however as the cream contains mineral oil and I depend on condoms for birth control (as well as STI defense) and the oil will degrade a condom. The doctor gave me a prescription for a yeast infection treatment as well because odds are good the antibiotic, while killing off the bad bacteria, will kill off the good, yeast-controlling bacteria too. I’m taking acidophilius in an attempt to stave off a yeast infection though (and eating lots of soy yogurt!) I’m glad that this time I was responsible about my health rather than the last times I ignored it because it was something barely noticeable. I think MasterDoc is much happier with me too. Getting treated is a good thing. Ignoring infections is a bad thing.

I’m sure most of you are going, “Eugh! I don’t want to think of your vag as infected! I want to hear about your happy, orgasmic, squirting vag!” And surely, soon I will be back to normal and having a wonderful time. But this is real life and sometimes infections happen. No biggie. (Some times I get colds, or sinus infections - doesn’t make me a bad person or dirty or anything like that - and neither does BV.) I should be all healthy again just in time to have a wonderful time at Dark Odyssey Winter Fire. Cool. The timing could have been a little better, as there’s a special foursome planned for Davey’s birthday this weekend (the lucky boy is getting three women, all to himself) and I won’t be able to participate fully now, but it could have been worse and ruined my first Dark Odyssey experience.

STI Education

I have been known to talk about STIs (sexually transmitted infections) although not as often on this blog as my old blog. I’m very much an advocate for knowledge about transmission, risks, open discussion and a sane, compassionate approach to someone who has an STI. Fairly often there are threads on the discussion boards on collarme or fetlife where people talk about STIs and I find a pervasive attitude - there are many who will not play with anyone who does not have proof of a clear test to provide. I take issue with this for various reasons. Firstly, I take issue with notion that negative tests guarantee you don’t have something. Tests are imperfect. Please don’t read this to mean that tests are worthless - certainly regular testing is a good idea and treatment of anything that arises is advisable. However, a negative test does not guarantee that someone doesn’t have an infection. The example I like to use is how I’ve, from time to time, tested negative for herpes in the years I’ve had it. It’s possible for the virus to be dormant enough that it doesn’t show on a test. There’s also the issue that being tested “for everything” doesn’t necessarily include all STIs - herpes is frequently not automatically included in batteries of tests. (Not unless you have knowingly been exposed, and even then some doctors don’t think it’s worth testing unless you’ve had symptoms.)

Secondly, it is possible to play with someone with an STI and keep the risk to an acceptable level. Dismissing someone out of hand just because they have herpes, or HPV, or even HIV really eliminates a lot of good people from your life right off the bat. I’ve often said that the stigma against STIs is far worse than the STI itself (in my mind, this is true more for herpes or HPV or one of the treatable bacterial infections, rather than HIV which is a serious infection). People treating those with STIs like they’re pariahs, untouchable, bad people, etc. is really unacceptable. I made a poor choice with someone who was dishonest at one time in my life and I was unlucky enough to catch something. But you know what? Herpes is a really minor skin disease. People’s attitudes towards it are really blown all out of proportion. On a recent thread on fetlife someone pointed out that their partner wasn’t comfortable having intercourse with them because they had dormant HSV (herpes simplex virus), but this same partner had nearly died in a motorcycle accident, and yet he still rides his motorcycle. It’s funny to me the grand risks that people will take, but when it comes to an STI they flip out. It is possible to have sex with someone with an STI and not catch it. Condom use is very helpful. People being open and honest with each other, so that the one with an STI feels comfortable bringing up any outbreaks, symptoms, etc. in a non-judgmental environment, will go a long way towards preventing infection. I’m not saying you should ever take a risk with someone who is actively presenting symptoms of an STI - have them get treated, get the outbreak to clear up, get the warts removed before having sex. BUT, speaking as someone who has had sex with people who have HPV, it’s not an automatic deal breaker for me.  As long as we’re both not presenting symptoms at that time, I use condoms and take the risk (and as of my last test results I was negative for HPV). And with so many people the minor risk of infection is so worth spending intimate time with them. It’s possible to take care of your sexual health, while taking calculated risks. If you look at transmission rates for a variety of STIs they’re really not nearly as bad as you are led to believe. I’ll have to ask MasterDoc for the link, but he found stats about HIV transmission and the odds, even when one partner definitely has HIV, of catching it are not huge. Transmission via oral sex is actually quite unlikely. (Not impossible, but unlikely.)

We live in a society where anti-sex sentiment pervades, and the fear tactics used when discussing STIs are just anti-sex propaganda. Yes, there’s a risk. Yes, it’s great if you prevent catching anything because it’s a drag to have an STI. But no, your life will not end, you do not become a bad person, you are not “dirty” if you catch something. And no, you will not then pass it on to all your future sex partners. I’ve lived 10 years with herpes and to the best of my knowledge no one has caught it from me. I take an anti-viral daily, I know my body and avoid sexual contact when I have symptoms and I use condoms consistently. I’ve slept with a lot of people since catching it, and no one has come back to me to say they’ve got it. (I stay on friendly terms with many exes, so I would hear from many past partners if something came up.) When you look at the stats for sero-discordant couples (one has herpes, the other doesn’t) the transmission rate after one year of unprotected sex is only around 3-5%. I hope that my being open will help some people realize that the stigma against those with STIs is really unfair, and grounded in an irrational sense of fear. Just because something is transmitted via sexual contact does not make it a worse infection to get. Ignorance breeds fear - read up on non-biased studies of STIs and get to know what the real risks are.

UK Guardian: The Aids scare was one of the most distorted, duplicitous and cynical public health panics of the last 30 years

My old blog was more generally sex-oriented, whereas this one is BDSM oriented mainly. But something I’d like to incorporate from the old blog is education about STIs. I figure if you’re going to talk about sex you need to talk about the good, the bad, and the ugly. I thought this article was fascinating though, and it goes along with my general thinking that STI risks are blown out of proportion as a way to control people’s sexuality. Turns out with HIV that’s actually true. The hysteria of the past 25 years? Overblown in regards to a heterosexual pandemic. Of course, I can understand why it was overblown in the early days, no one knew what this new disease was or how you got it exactly. But with knowledge hasn’t come a backing off of the scaremongering.

At any rate, it’s knowledge like this that confirms my belief in taking calculated risks sexually. Yes I swing, yes I’m a slut, but I use condoms without fail. Condoms are terrific in preventing HIV and hepatitis C. Most of the other diseases are easily curable. That leaves HPV and herpes. With the HPV risk I make sure I get regular pap tests to head off any potential cancer issues. With herpes I just have to accept the risk. Considering people who have it aren’t contagious many more days than they are, I don’t consider it a huge risk even so. Your mileage may vary, but I accept that disease risk is a part of life. I risk disease every day I go work with the public. Doesn’t keep me from going to work. Why would I let it keep me from having sex? Testing is imperfect at best so I don’t rely on it (but do get tested anyway because if something comes up I want to be able to take care of it.)

(On a side note I had to giggle at the name of the doctor cited in the article. Dr. de Cock!? Ok, Beavis and Butthead moment over.)